This blog presents my discovery of scandalous criminal misconduct in a sham divorce action by an unmarried woman, that being Susan Lee Rice (Susan). In the great game of South Carolina Divorce Lotto Susan was awarded the residential property of a man to whom she was not married and allowed to enslave him for the support of her bastard child which he could not have sired.

The victim in this case was my future husband Richard S. Collette (Richard). For the politically sensitive, I am providing copies of email correspondence between me and this now 25 year old man which will show that my use of the 'B' word was not badly chosen.

This fraud was aided and abetted by officers of the Charleston County family court of South Carolina. In blatant violation of "all law" officers of the court became knowing agents and enforcers of multiple acts of fraud in this case. There are Constitutional and Human Rights issues here that should be important to all citizens and especially to those of the Ninth Judicial Circuit of this state who could easily find themselves at similar risk.

Speaking of "all law", I have provided an avalanche of legal citations in this matter which may be of interest to some readers. God knows no one in that odious place called family court had any interest in them.

After entering into wedded bliss in 1999, I slowly began uncovering shocking facts about the divorce action between Susan and Richard. I thought it best to double check documents from that action while I was reviewing Richard's taxes in 1999 for updating. However, Richard and no one in his immediate family had any of that paperwork.

After protracted stalling from the family court Richard finally received a copy of the alleged decree of divorce on April 7, 2000 almost a full year after we had first requested it-and Thirteen (13) years after it was issued September 22, 1987. Initially it made no sense that the person listed as Richard's attorney would fail to provide him a copy-it became clearer upon further investigation.

I found this decree of divorce to be so critically facially defective that I thought it must be a bad joke of some sort. It was beyond me to comprehend how any sane / sober lawyer, law firm or even judge would allow their reputation to be attached to such an outrageous piece of garbage, but there it was-in black and white. I am providing a copy of it followed by a duplicate with my work notes and legal citations and will not repeat too much of it here.

Click Here to Enter Lilly's Blog
Click Here for Factual Evidence